On Mask Blanks and the Substrate Sovereigns of Advanced Lithography
Hoya Corporation's [7741.T] 60% market share in Photomask Blanks
In the latticework of modern semiconductor fabrication, few elements are more foundational—yet more persistently overlooked—than the mask blank. It is a component whose invisibility to the lay observer belies its systemic importance. Every integrated circuit begins its life projected onto a silicon wafer via a mask—a patterned stencil carrying the blueprint of the chip’s architecture. But before there is a mask, there is a mask blank: a substrate so optically pure and structurally precise that even a deviation on the order of a nanometre can compromise an entire wafer lot.
The dominant force in this esoteric but critical space is Hoya Corporation, headquartered in Japan. While commonly understood by equity markets as a purveyor of vision care products—spectacle lenses, contact lenses, and optical health instruments—Hoya holds a less publicised but vastly more consequential position in global semiconductor manufacturing. As of 2025, the firm commands an estimated 60%+ share of the global market for photomask blanks across lithographic technologies. More crucially, in the narrow but strategically vital segment of extreme ultraviolet (EUV) mask blanks, Hoya’s dominance exceeds 75% by volume, and arguably more by technical performance and process qualifications.
To understand the gravity of this position, one must appreciate what a mask blank is not: it is not merely a sheet of glass, nor a passive support layer. It is a multi-layered precision optical device, fabricated under cleanroom conditions more stringent than those used for surgical implants or spacecraft instrumentation. At its base is an ultra-flat, low-thermal-expansion glass or glass-ceramic substrate, typically a synthetic fused silica or proprietary material such as Corning’s ULE™. This substrate must exhibit sub-picometre surface roughness, atomic-level flatness (typically λ/10 at 633 nm), and virtually zero birefringence. Surface defects exceeding even a few tens of nanometres are disqualifying.
For EUV masks, the substrate is coated with a highly engineered multilayer mirror stack, usually comprising alternating molybdenum and silicon layers, each precisely ~3 nm thick, tuned to reflect 13.5 nm EUV light with maximum constructive interference. In practice, this stack consists of around 40 to 50 such bilayers, topped with a ruthenium-based capping layer and an absorber stack—often tantalum-based—engineered to pattern the EUV radiation during exposure. The entire structure is optically reflective (not transmissive, as in deep ultraviolet masks), and the interface tolerances are measured not merely in nanometres but in angstroms.
You’re currently a free subscriber to Global Markets by Karim Al-Mansour. For the full Detailed Institutional note with access to models and charts, please subscribe below
The manufacturing process for these blanks involves a series of physically and chemically orthogonal operations: sub-molecular polishing, plasma-enhanced deposition, ultra-high-vacuum sputtering, defect scanning via e-beam and actinic inspection tools, and rigorous thermal annealing to ensure dimensional stability during mask exposure at elevated tool temperatures. Any deviation in film thickness, layer stress, or defectivity—particularly phase defects in the EUV multilayer stack—can manifest as catastrophic print errors on wafer patterns at the 3 nm and 2 nm logic nodes. Consequently, mask blanks are not fungible commodities but bespoke optical structures, each batch tuned to the photonic characteristics and defect budgets of a given node and process architecture.
This gives Hoya extraordinary leverage in the upstream toolchain. The firm’s mask blanks are not sold broadly on the open market but rather qualified painstakingly with the photomask shops of leading-edge logic and memory fabricators—TSMC, Samsung, Intel—and by extension with ASML, the sole provider of EUV lithography systems. Each new generation of Hoya EUV blanks must be pre-qualified for flatness, reflectivity, and defectivity against the optical specifications of ASML’s EUV scanner optics, including their numerical aperture characteristics and flare budgets. The co-dependency between Hoya and ASML here is material: an EUV scanner is unusable without a high-fidelity EUV mask, and such a mask cannot exist without a defect-free EUV blank.
Critically, there are few, if any, credible alternatives. AGC Inc. (formerly Asahi Glass) maintains a presence in DUV mask blanks and has made some strides in EUV readiness, but its ability to match Hoya’s defectivity levels at scale remains uncertain. SCHOTT and Corning supply base substrate materials, but not finished blanks with full film stacks and EUV compatibility. In practice, this leaves Hoya as a de facto gatekeeper to the highest-end lithographic layers in advanced semiconductors.
The strategic implications are considerable. As the United States, the Netherlands, and Japan tighten export controls on advanced lithographic equipment and know-how—chiefly targeting Chinese foundries—the control of mask blank production becomes an implicit tool of leverage. While public focus tends to gravitate toward ASML’s scanners and Tokyo Electron’s deposition systems, the reality is that without access to defect-free EUV mask blanks, the construction of 5 nm and below nodes becomes operationally impossible. Hoya’s fabrication knowledge, proprietary polishing and deposition processes, and mask blank inspection infrastructure represent a sovereign industrial capability that is neither easily replicable nor rapidly scalable elsewhere.
In market terms, this raises fundamental questions about the valuation and strategic identity of Hoya Corporation. It trades, still, with the multiple profile of a diversified optics firm, rather than a mission-critical enabler of sub-5 nm lithography. Yet the quality of its recurring revenues, the irreplicability of its manufacturing process, and its embeddedness in the process design kits (PDKs) of global foundries imply a much more defensible and perhaps underappreciated economic position.
For investors with a focus on supply chain criticality, industrial resilience, or geopolitical leverage in semiconductors, the mask blank domain—particularly in EUV—is not merely a bottleneck, but a choke point. And within that choke point, Hoya is not a supplier; it is the substrate sovereign.
Financial Architecture, Capital Requirements, and Strategic Lock-In
The economic characteristics of the mask blank segment—especially for extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography—are defined by a combination of capital intensity, extreme process specificity, and system-level lock-in. From a financial and strategic investment perspective, these attributes render the market structurally oligopolistic, with Hoya as the sole apex operator at the intersection of all three constraints.
Capital Expenditure and Process Entrenchment
The cost of establishing an EUV-grade mask blank manufacturing facility is not merely a matter of scale or capital deployment; it is a matter of access, qualification, and cumulative process knowledge. Based on engineering extrapolations and internal cost structure disclosures from analogous high-precision optics fabrication, greenfield replication of a Hoya-class EUV mask blank line would require not less than $2.5–3.0 billion in capex, excluding process IP and in-house metrology capability. Cleanroom requirements must exceed ISO Class 1 over large-area footprint, with humidity, temperature, and vibration controls more severe than those for EUV scanner assembly itself.
Beyond physical plant, the deposition and inspection equipment involved—multi-chamber UHV PVD systems, EUV-specific metrology platforms, ultra-high-resolution actinic inspection (AIMS), and e-beam based repair and review tools—are either internally designed by Hoya or custom-fabricated by Japanese and Dutch tool vendors under restrictive export control regimes. Inspection systems, in particular, are not commercially available at sufficient resolution to qualify EUV multilayer defects under 10 nm unless specifically tuned to the target stack, which Hoya does via proprietary tool-path design. These process parameters are guarded as tightly as photomask phase shift designs or foundry process design kits.
Critically, each generation of EUV mask blanks must be co-developed and co-qualified with ASML’s EUV scanner roadmap, which is now progressing from 0.33 NA (numerical aperture) to 0.55 NA High-NA systems. These new systems alter flare sensitivity, substrate topography tolerances, and defect detectability thresholds, rendering legacy mask blanks non-transferable. As of Q1 2025, Hoya is understood to be the only vendor with validated blank products for High-NA EUV systems—critical for logic nodes below 2 nm.
Financial Profile and Margins
Despite the capital intensity, the gross margins on EUV mask blanks are among the highest in the semiconductor upstream stack. While Hoya does not disclose segment-level margin data, triangulation from its Advanced Products Division—where mask blanks are reported alongside photonics and optics—indicates EBIT margins north of 30% for the category, significantly higher than the sub-15% EBIT margin seen in their life sciences and healthcare optics units. ASPs (average selling prices) for EUV blanks are estimated at $8,000–12,000 per unit depending on layer count and qualification status, with premium variants exceeding $15,000 for low-defectivity High-NA versions. Unit volumes are modest—on the order of tens of thousands per year—but revenue is disproportionately resilient, given that each EUV scanner in use globally requires multiple validated blanks per mask set, and each mask set services only a finite reticle field.
Hoya’s recurring revenue base is further stabilised by the time-lag between tool installation and mask blank qualification. A single new EUV node requires 6–12 months of blank pre-qualification, defectivity benchmarking, and yield tuning—effectively locking customers into a given supplier across full technology generations. In turn, this creates a deferred-revenue effect analogous to long-duration service contracts, but without the explicit booking.
Client Exposure and Strategic Risk Buffer
Hoya’s client exposure profile is both concentrated and systemically resilient. Its primary customers are not discretionary electronics manufacturers but the core tier of global logic and memory foundries: TSMC, Intel, Samsung, and SK Hynix, with indirect dependency from Apple, NVIDIA, AMD, and Qualcomm via foundry exposure. The durability of this client base is not merely due to product quality, but to qualification inertia. EUV-capable fabs design their mask shops around Hoya’s optical constants, reflectivity curves, and defect maps. Migration to a new supplier, even if technologically feasible, would entail months of lithographic requalification and wafer-level yield risk—untenable for foundries operating at sub-5 nm geometries and at full utilisation.
Furthermore, Hoya's upstream dependencies are limited and well-managed. It sources ultra-low-expansion (ULE) glass from a captive supplier network in Japan, with some redundancy available via long-term contracts with Corning and SCHOTT. Crucially, unlike ASML, which relies on German optics and American light sources, Hoya’s supply chain is almost entirely domestic or ally-sourced, shielded from near-term geopolitical choke points.
Market Structure and Absence of Viable Substitutes
The plausible entry of new players is constrained not only by capital or IP barriers but also by the lack of a credible path to toolchain insertion. Tool and materials co-development cycles in EUV lithography span 5–7 years, and mask blank qualification is intrinsically sequenced with scanner development. This means even a well-funded entrant with state-of-the-art deposition equipment could not displace Hoya before the next EUV generation was itself obsolete. AGC, the only semi-credible peer, has yet to demonstrate phase defectivity levels below 0.1/cm² at 13.5 nm actinic wavelengths—Hoya has already surpassed this threshold on volume product.
From a regulatory standpoint, there is no active antitrust scrutiny over mask blank concentration, chiefly because the end-use segment is highly specialised and geographically consolidated. However, there is increasing interest in allied sovereigns—namely the United States, Taiwan, South Korea, and the Netherlands—on expanding domestic capability in upstream EUV infrastructure. Hoya’s position, however, remains unassailable in the short to medium term due to irreplicable process legacy and photonic design entrenchment.
Conclusion
In sum, Hoya’s EUV mask blank division does not simply benefit from market share; it defines the market physics of advanced photomask substrates. Its technical moat is enforced not by price competition, but by atomic-scale engineering constraints, interlocked qualification cycles, and decades-deep co-development with scanner OEMs and top-tier foundries. It is an asset class unto itself: sovereign-critical, valuation-dislocated, and structurally integral to the sub-3 nm global semiconductor roadmap. No upstream segment—not high-k dielectric, not immersion optics, not even EUV light sources—is as singularly controlled by one firm with as little plausible disintermediation.
Any investor, regulator, or strategic planner modelling advanced semiconductor resilience must not begin with chip design or fab capacity. They must begin with the blank.
As always, thank you for reading.
As we continue exploring the complexities of global markets together, I’m genuinely humbled by the growth of this community—now 56,000+ strong. It’s an honor to engage with such an insightful and globally diverse audience, with readers spanning 101 countries, from the United States to Switzerland.
Your feedback and engagement have been instrumental in shaping the topics I explore. If you've found value in these perspectives, I’d love for you to share this newsletter with your networks. Together, we’re fostering deeper discussions and critical thinking about where the markets are heading. Please write to me at kam@amanahcapital.uk